Some SMSFs are also underperformers

31 May 2018
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

The Productivity Commission’s (PC’s) finding that many people have their superannuation in underperforming funds also extends to self-managed super funds (SMSFs), founder of SMSF Benchmarks, Nick Shugg, has said.

Shugg said that many SMSF trustees were disengaged with their funds and had “no idea” how it was performing, nor what they should do were it consistently underperforming.

“Trustees have an obligation to review their investment strategy, but most just pay lip service to that, to satisfy a ‘compliance hassle’,” according to Shugg.

He warned that there could be significant consequences to SMSFs not being managed well.

“It could mean that trustees fail to get the lifestyle they want, and it could mean that the whole superannuation trade-off breaks down. This is a problem for all of us because SMSFs make up a significant part of our economy.”

Shugg was referring to the “trade-off” that he thought the Federal Government applied in handing out tax breaks to save money in super, and thus be more self-funded in retirement, on the trade-off that the Aged Pensions saved should be greater than the tax benefits handed out.

Shugg said, however, that it was not the role of the Australian Taxation Office, which only had the resources and mandate to check if trustees were managing their fund for compliance, to worry about whether trustees were actually doing a good job of managing funds.

Rather, he said that the conversation with trustees needed to change to ensure better performance.

“We don’t necessarily need a compliance ‘stick’. It may be more effective to provide a carrot to lift the average performance of SMSFs,” Shugg said.

“Many self-directed trustees … are often unaware of the range of alternative approaches they could be including in the mix, which may lead to better outcomes.

“We need to change the conversation with trustees, to make it fun and less threatening for them to use benchmarking as part of a Strategic Management Process. If they start to look at how their fund is actually going, they will become more engaged, and open up to discovering other investment approaches, and they’ll be better placed to make good decisions and get better outcomes over time.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remain...

30 minutes 28 seconds ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

3 days 22 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

3 days 22 hours ago