Still room for clarification on NALE: Heffron

29 July 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Changes to legislation regarding non-arms length expenditure (NALE) “won’t please many” who are dealing with the payments, according to Heffron.

A key ruling from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) updated earlier rules on when transactions between a superannuation fund and another party created NALE.

NALE existed when expenses incurred by a self-managed super fund (SMSF) were less than the amount incurred if the parties had dealt with each other on an arms length basis.

According to Meg Heffron, managing director of Heffron, said: “In other words, if a fund’s costs are artificially low, some or all of its income is taxed at the top marginal tax rate of 45% rather than the normal superannuation rates of 15% or nil.

“The ATO has consulted widely and has ended up in a place that won’t please a lot of us on every front.”

The final ruling divided NALE into two buckets:

  • Costs that related specifically to an individual asset – in which case all future income in relation to that asset is tainted forever and will be non-arms length income (NALI) (including capital gains); and
  • Costs which don’t relate to an individual asset and are therefore deemed to relate to all income of the fund – in which case NALE means all fund income was NALI.

It also drew a distinction between work done by self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees and whether they would face a NALE problem in the future, which was dependent on:

  • Work done in the person’s individual capacity – which might create a NALE problem if the fund was not charged arm’s length rates; or
  • Work done in their trustee capacity – where it was generally OK not to charge for the work, since being a trustee naturally involves (unpaid) work and sometimes that work will leverage particular skills the trustee happened to have.

Heffron said there still remained several issues to be worked through on the ruling, which included staff discounts and use of company equipment by financial advisers and accountants.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 9 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 9 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 10 hours ago