Super expert urged for Financial Systems Inquiry panel

12 December 2013
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has urged that a superannuation expert be included on the panel overseeing the Government's Forthcoming Financial Systems Inquiry.

The recommendation is contained in a submission to the Treasury responding to the Government's draft terms of reference, with the AIST also seeking to persuade the Government to make the risk inherent in self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) a key issue for review, referencing "an examination of the potential impact of Self-Managed Superannuation Fund failure on funding the age pension".

The submission, signed by AIST chief executive, Tom Garcia, then goes on to note the "usefulness" of SMSFs to some sectors of the Australian population but to also point to their regulation by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the possible systemic risks.

"A feature of past financial system reviews was to examine major changes since the last review," the AIST submission said. "One such major change is the growth of Self Managed Superannuation Funds (SMSFs). Since June 2000, the amount of retirement moneys within SMSFs has grown from $74.9 billion to $531.5 billion in September 2013.

"AIST recognises the usefulness of SMSFs to sectors of the Australian population. However, given that SMSFs are now a significant component of the Australian retirement system, an examination of the regulation of SMSFs as well as systemic risk would be timely," it said.

The AIST submission also calls for the Financial System Inquiry to investigate the legislative and tax settings around annuities.

"AIST advocates that where appropriate, the legislative and taxation environment for retirement products and various sectors within superannuation must be on an equal playing field," it said. "AIST supports a review of the legislative framework for Annuities (forming part of the Post Retirement and Superannuation Sustainability Review), so that members are incentivised to take up all or part of their retirement benefit as an annuity."

However it added that, in saying this, AIST recognised that members with amounts lower than the "Adequacy Benchmark" should not be penalised for taking part or all of their benefits as an annuity.

In calling for a superannuation expert to be on the inquiry panel, the AIST submission noted the level of funds controlled in the sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 22 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 22 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 23 hours ago