Superannuation funds are bringing investment functions in-house because technology has caught up to managing alternative investments, according to Oliver Johnson, E-Front sales director.
Johnson said super funds' interest in alternative assets had been on the rise due to low returns from traditional asset classes.
Because costs were at the forefront of new legislation, funds were bringing investment expertise in-house to avoid the high costs of investing in alternatives.
He said when a fund reached a certain size in its alternative asset allocation, it made less sense to outsource the portfolio and double-up on costs, which could be expensive.
"If they were a new super fund, to start up an alternatives platform, I think they wouldn't really get past the board pushing the adviser route anymore - just because of the fees," he said.
Johnson said new technologies that could handle the increased data burden of alternatives were facilitating super funds' move to boosting internal investment expertise.
Smaller funds were also hiring an investment manager or two off the back of technology that could assist in increased transparency requirements and data to provide the reasoning behind complex investment decisions, he said.
In its pre-election policy document, the FSC highlighted 15 priority reforms, with superannuation featuring prominently, urging both major parties to avoid changing super taxes without a comprehensive tax review.
The Grattan Institute has labelled the Australian super system as “too complicated” and has proposed a three-pronged reform strategy to simplify superannuation in retirement.
Super funds delivered a strong 2024 result, with the median growth fund returning 11.4 per cent, driven by strong international sharemarket performance, new data has shown.
Australian Ethical has seen FUM growth of 27 per cent in the financial year to date.