AMP, Plum and BT in frame on corporate super mandates

25 May 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

An almost unprecedented number of corporate superannuation mandates are up for grabs with the likelihood that more than half of them will end up migrating to industry superannuation funds. 

According to consultants specialising in handling corporate superannuation mandates, around nine reviews are currently underway for corporate superannuation funds currently being serviced by the National Australia Bank-owned Plum, AMP Limited and Westpac’s BT. 

The upturn in corporate superannuation fund mandate reviews has been caused by the backlog generated by the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown which prompted corporate superannuation boards to put their plans on hold. 

“The boards of these corporate funds were thinking about reviewing their providers 12 months ago but have only recently decided to activate the process,” one consultant said. 

At the same time, at least some decisions to review have been prompted by National Australia Bank’s decision to sell its MLC Wealth business to IOOF, including its superannuation business, Plum. 

AMP Limited has been the subject of scrutiny with respect to corporate superannuation mandates in the wake of fall-out from the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry and as a recently as late last month acknowledged the “exit” of a corporate super mandate as being a factor in its cash outflows. 

The company valued its corporate superannuation assets under management at $28,361 million and used its full-year investor report to state that the 2020 financial year had been impacted by previously announced mandate losses in corporate super amounting to $1.8 billion and $1.8 billion of COVID-19 Early Release Super payments. 

One of the superannuation industry’s most experienced consultants, Deloitte’s Russell Mason confirmed the likelihood that a significant number of the corporate funds would select industry funds to meet their needs. 

“Ten or so years ago corporate superannuation boards might have ruled out a move to industry funds, but that is no longer the case,” he said. 

“Where a decision is being made, industry funds are getting 50% or more of the mandates,” Mason said. 

Mercer’s Brian Zanker confirmed the level of activity in the corporate superannuation space and said there was significant attention being directed towards movement generated by recent announcements and transactions. 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 8 hours ago