APRA on heat maps – listening but not consulting

29 October 2019
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has confirmed it will not be formally consulting with the industry on its controversial heat map proposal attaching to its member outcomes initiative.

APRA deputy chair, Helen Rowell has told Senate Estimates that there would be no formal consultation because the data the regulator is using is already in the public domain.

“We have data that is substantially already in the public domain. We are presenting that data in a different way, so we will be releasing that data,” she said. “We are briefing industry bodies and the industry more broadly and other stakeholders on what we're doing ahead of the release, but we are not formally consulting.”

Rowell was responding to questioning from NSW Labor Senator, Jenny McAllister, who said she was concerned that APRA was picking particular data points to put into the heat maps, but that those data points were being selected in the absence of benchmarks having been set.

However, Rowell claimed the absence of benchmarks would not necessarily create an issue.

“At the end of the day the benchmarks that are specified in the legislation are a matter for Treasury and the government. One of the reasons for us liaising and discussing benchmarks with Treasury is to seek convergence and alignment where we can,” she said.

“Having said that, I think it is important to understand that our heat maps are deliberately presenting multiple performance measures in all of the categories that we're reporting, because, as we have said on many occasions, in assessing performance you need to look at a number of different measures over different time periods to get a complete assessment of the performance of products, funds and what trustees are delivering.

“In that sense, the fact that there may be a different measure prescribed in regulation, which is in addition to the measures that APRA is publishing, is not necessarily an issue from our point of view. It will just provide a different lens on performance,” Rowell said.

She said that while APRA was open to feedback she believed “it is our call as to how we publish our data and the information that we present, and this is not a policy consultation”.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 7 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 7 months ago

The rollout of further tariffs in the US from August is expected to decrease economic growth in the US in the longer term, AMP and asset managers warn....

6 hours ago

Superannuation funds have posted another year of strong returns, but this time, the gains weren’t powered solely by Silicon Valley....

6 hours ago

Australia’s $4.1 trillion superannuation system is doing more than funding retirements – it’s quietly fuelling the nation’s productivity, lifting GDP, and adding thousand...

6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5