The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has moved to reduce the compliance burden of super funds under its watch by changing a definition and cutting back on heavily-criticised duplication in reporting requirements.
After a series of submissions from stakeholders about onerous standards on ‘select investment options', APRA says it has reduced the number of options funds must report on by around 50 per cent, by only targeting funds with quantitative thresholds above $200 million or five per cent of total fund assets.
It has also removed the obligation for funds to report both annually and quarterly, retaining the quarterly requirement, it said in a statement.
The changes followed criticism from funds about the onerous nature of reporting requirements of select investment options and the potentially confusing definition of what qualifies as a select option, which has also now been clarified.
"APRA is confident that the final requirements strike the right balance between APRA and other stakeholders having access to necessary information, and addressing industry's concerns about the costs and complexity involved in reporting this information," APRA member Helen Rowell said in response to the changes.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.