Questions from a Liberal Senator have raised doubts about the use of union-based superannuation liaison officers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has placed a question mark over the future of Union liaison officers by some industry superannuation funds pointing out that they fulfill no formally recognised role.
APRA was responding to a question on notice from Tasmanian Liberal Senator, David Bushby who had asked whether the regulator was aware of some industry funds providing funding for the superannuation liaison officers attached to particular trade unions.
The regulator said that while it was aware of the liaison officer positions their existence was not consistent with the "responsible person" definition under the prudential standards.
APRA noted however that it understood the liaison officers were involved in enhancing engagement in superannuation through direct contact and it was therefore likely their existence was not in conflict with the sole purpose test.
However, the regulator went on to indicate that the payment of the liaison officers might raise issues with respect to related party transactions and perceptions of conflict of interest.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.