POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
APRA updates super governance obligations
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has written to superannuation funds to update them on amendments to prudential governance, including changes to stress testing and liquidity management.
The enhancements to SPS 530 Investment Governance would help ensure registrable superannuation entities (RSEs) met their obligations prudently to select, manage and monitor investments.
In a response to submissions on possible revisions, APRA executive director, Renee Roberts, said respondents had requested guidance that better reflected current investment practices, less prescription and guidance on environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks.
Regarding ESG, APRA said it intended to issue draft guidance on how an RSE licensee could clearly demonstrate ESG risks, reflect ESG considerations in their investment strategy and manage material ESG risks.
Regarding stress testing, APRA said there was a “significant need to improve practices” to ensure stress testing processes were improved, formalised and incorporated into investment decisions. This need had been heightened by periods of recent volatility in investment markets.
“APRA encourages RSE licensees to undertake a stress testing programme at least annually, with reporting to the board or relevant sub-committee clearly demonstrating the outcomes of the stress testing, the assumptions and modelling used, and where tolerances are breached, the potential actions that may be taken.”
The amendments proposed by APRA were:
- Consistent use of terminology to ‘develop, implement and maintain’ frameworks, policies and processes, where relevant. The addition of ‘maintain’ emphasises the iterative and dynamic approach that APRA requires RSE licensees to adopt in their approach to investment governance;
- Clarification that stress-testing programmes and valuation governance are to be regarded as components of the overall investment governance framework;
- Clarification that regular reporting to the board for each investment option and MySuper product does not necessarily have to include detailed reporting on individual investments. Instead, the board must approve appropriate measures to monitor performance, including the benchmarking methodology, and ensure that investments that are failing to meet benchmarks, adversely affecting the performance of an investment option, are reported to it; and
- Clarification that the valuation governance framework requirements do not require the establishment of a stand-alone board valuation sub-committee.
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
