ASFA challenges Treasury data on superannuation

16 February 2012
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

New research conducted by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has challenged data being used by the Treasury.

The research - which examines government assistance for retirement incomes - claims the current tax expenditure estimates produced by the Treasury greatly overestimate the additional tax revenue that would result if current tax concessions for superannuation were abolished.

Indeed, the research paper - developed by ASFA's director of research, Ross Clare - claims concessional contribution caps have had a significant impact on contributions by upper income earners, reducing the ongoing cost of the tax concessions for contributions by over $3 billion a year compared to previous historical levels.

It said the Treasury tax expenditure estimates appeared to be based on the unrealistic assumption that if the investment earnings in superannuation accounts were taxed on the basis of each individual's tax rate, then there would be no discount for capital gains on assets held for more than 12 months.

"All of these factors taken together suggest that the tax expenditures for superannuation may actually be around half those reported in the Tax Expenditures Statement," the ASFA research analysis said.

The ASFA research paper also pours cold water on the recommendations contained within the Henry Tax Review arguing the adoption of the Henry Review proposals in regard to the taxation of superannuation contributions would lead to the introduction of considerable new forms of complexity in the taxation of superannuation.

"They would also lead to a reduction in take-home pay for most individuals and would reduce taxation collections by the Government," it said.

"The Henry Review proposals in regard to the taxation of superannuation fund investment earnings would also have a negative impact on taxation revenue for many decades, with unclear impacts on equity between fund members," the research paper said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

19 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

19 hours 28 minutes ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

20 hours 27 minutes ago