Any changes to Australia’s superannuation system flowing from the Productivity Commission’s latest draft report need to acknowledge the world-leading nature of the existing regime and the diverse needs of members, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
While welcoming some elements of the PC report, ASFA has warned that the recommendations, if implemented, have the potential to materially transform the industry.
“The proposal to allocate default superannuation to ten so called ‘best-in-show’ funds would dramatically change the retirement funding landscape, and raises questions with respect to innovation, competitive intensity and diversity,” ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy said.
He pointed out that Australia has a world-class superannuation system and that the PC’s draft report had acknowledged that the majority of members and assets in the system were in products that had performed reasonably well.
“What’s more, only a small share of members are dissatisfied with their fund’s performance,” Fahy said.
“Any changes to the system need to recognise the diverse needs of fund members,” he said. “Members’ needs differ widely, including with respect to their occupation and their location.”
“In particular, many smaller funds are able to provide niche offerings to their members, including tailored insurance and investment options, and the importance of this to members should not be underestimated.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.