POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
ASIC urges super trustees to improve target market determinations
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is calling on superannuation trustees to improve the effectiveness of target market determinations (TMDs) after a sample review of trustee compliance found some poor practices.
The regulator reviewed a sample of 55 TMDs prepared by 27 superannuation trustees across the industry, retail, corporate and public sectors for both accumulation and retirement products.
“The design and distribution obligations were introduced to improve consumer outcomes,” said Danielle Press, commissioner at the ASIC. “As product issuers, it is the fundamental responsibility of trustees to know their product offering and who it is right for.”
Press said trustees should clearly define their target markets and review triggers in the TMDs using objective, specific and measurable parameters.
“Clear target market determinations with appropriate underlying review triggers and controls, point to a trustee’s sound understanding of their product and the design and distribution obligations [DDOs],” she said.
“Some of the target market determinations that we looked at gave us comfort that they may be part of a well-designed and comprehensive governance programme. However, others by their lack of specificity, raised questions about the underlying arrangements that trustees have in place to ensure their products reach the right consumers.”
DDOs require firms to design financial products to meet the needs of consumers and to distribute their products in a more targeted manner. Trustees are required to produce TMDs for choice superannuation products offered after DDOs commenced on 5 October 2021.
“We expect all trustees to consider these observations when reviewing their target market determinations,” said Press. “Trustees are strongly encouraged to focus on clarity and specificity to ensure these documents are fit-for-purpose.
“Trustees must not adopt a ‘set and forget’ approach to their target market determinations. Failure to review them regularly and take corrective action can result in harm if the product is inconsistent with the objectives, financial situation and needs of consumers in the target market.
“ASIC is now focusing on compliance with the design and distribution obligations, and we will move to enforce the obligations where necessary.”
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
Money Management staff writers are writers who contribute to the website from time to time. If you would like to discuss the content contained within this article please contact us.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
