The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has highlighted some funds which failed the performance test may have risked misleading members about performance.
Funds which failed the annual performance, which was in its first iteration last year, were required to notify their members of the underperformance. There were 13 MySuper funds which failed the test last year and all but three of them had since merged or planned to do so.
ASIC subsequently conducted a review of how those funds communicated this.
ASIC said: “The review found that trustees whose products failed generally complied with the legal obligations to notify their members of the failed test and to disclose the failed test on their website. However, the communication strategies of some trustees may have risked confusing or misleading members about their product’s performance”.
Areas of concern included:
ASIC commissioner Danielle Press said: “Trustees should act in their members’ best financial interests by being transparent about the performance of their product. They should communicate their performance test results to members in a balanced, clear and factual way.
“Communication strategies that don’t prominently disclose the test result or obscure the importance of a failed result in some way are not acceptable.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.