The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has sought to hit back at Industry Super Australia (ISA) claims alleging that employees will be denied appropriate choice as a result of the implementation of Single Touch Payroll (STP) arrangements.
Less than 24 hours after a statement issued by ISA chief executive, David Whiteley, the ATO acknowledged the commentary and issued a point by point denial of his and other assertions regarding the new system.
“As the government agency leading the implementation and administration of the Single Touch Payroll, the ATO would like to clarify some misleading assertions made in this commentary,” the ATO said before outlining each assertion and then responding:
Incorrect. The online service is optional. Employees can choose to use existing paper processes to provide their Tax File Number declaration and choice of super fund. This is confirmed in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Budget Savings (Omnibus) Bill 2016.
Incorrect. The ATO implements government policy and develops implementation arrangements based on the law. The Budget Savings (Omnibus) Act 2016 was passed by Parliament on 16 September 2016. The Explanatory Memorandum states there would be no change to an employee’s ability to make a choice of super fund and no change to an employer’s responsibility to provide information as required about super choice.
Incorrect. Current safeguards still apply regarding default super funds. Where no choice is made, entitlements are paid to the employer’s default fund. New employees starting their first job can choose the employer’s default fund through the online form. Other super accounts are not displayed until the member has separately opened a new account with a fund.
Incorrect. Once an employee has successfully entered the information to be sent to their new employer, they are prompted to view and consolidate any existing accounts.
Correct. However, the online employee commencement forms are optional for both the employer and the employee.
Incorrect. The ATO is seeking to provide a more streamlined experience for employers and employees. It is not about ‘tracking’ businesses.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.