ATO questioned over lack of superannuation stapling advertising

22 February 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) did not undertake any mass market advertising for the Your Future, Your Super (YFYS) reform including superannuation stapling changes.

Appearing at Senate Estimates, Labor Senator Jess Walsh, said the Senate had spoken to Treasury who referred them to the ATO on questions concerning advertising and outreach regarding YFYS.

Responding to Walsh, ATO deputy commissioner, superannuation and employer obligations, Emma Rosenzweig, said the ATO did not undertake any paid ‘above-the-line’ (ATL) advertising campaigns for YFYS.

ATL was focused on mass media promotion to reach large audiences and includes media such as radio, TV and print whereas below the line advertising refers to targeted marketing such as email campaigns.

Rosenzweig said the ATO did employ its existing methods of communication, including direct messages to all 800,000 employers, educating them on new stapling obligations.

“We also worked through our usual stakeholder groups; we had social media posts; we had fairly comprehensive material about these obligations,” she said.

To clarify, Senator Walsh asked whether the only way for employees to access information that stapling was going to occur was through the ATO’s website or through Facebook.

In reply, Rosenzweig said stapling only applied to new employees and an employer did not need to go back and request stapling for existing employees and that new employees were given a superannuation choice form by their employer.

“The most targeted way that we had to make sure that employees understood the impacts of stapling was to make it very prominent in that choice process that if they did not select a fund their employer would use the stapling service and receive a stapled fund for them,” Rosenzweig said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Your kidding me on Tue, 02/22/2022 - 19:44

So, the whole stapling reform was to encourage new workers to make nominate a fund to be stapled to, but the ATO or government didn’t consider it worth it, or they had a duty to run, a mass education campaign to explain such a significant change? That’s a big fail in my book.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 2 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 2 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 2 months ago

 What is CSC and how does its investment strategy stand out?Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (CSC) is a retirement benefits provider for members of the Austra...

1 day ago

What were the key factors that influenced your fund's performance in 2024, and how did market conditions impact your investment strategy?UniSuper’s Balanced (default) opt...

1 day 1 hour ago

APRA has announced eight proposals aimed at pushing entities, including super funds, to move beyond treating compliance with certain requirements as a mere box-ticking ex...

1 day 2 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS