AUSTRAC has issued updated guidance to ensure individuals who cannot provide traditional identity documents can access superannuation.
There were currently some members of the population who were unable to access traditional identity documents including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, people in remote communities, gender diverse people and those fleeing domestic violence.
This proved problematic when financial institutions required documentation to access their services.
However, changes meant there were now alternative ways to verify an identity while still satisfying anti-money laundering regulations including referee statements, government correspondence and a community ID.
AUSTRAC chief executive, Nicole Rose, said AUSTRAC was committed to financial inclusion.
“The guidance will help financial institutions adopt flexible and compassionate approaches to customer identity processes, while still maintaining due diligence processes where they are concerned that a customer is not who they claim to be,” Ms Rose said.
“Having flexible customer identification procedures in place is essential to ensure that members of the community can access financial services so that temporary or systemic barriers do not prevent people from gaining this access.”
Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) CEO, Eva Scheerlinck, said: “Some members of the community, particularly the most disadvantaged, are not always in a position to provide traditional forms of identification.
“While verifying the identity of someone is important, those who struggle to do so should not be denied the financial services they need, including their superannuation savings.
“The updated guidelines from AUSTRAC strike the right balance between information security and social inclusion by allowing for flexibility in procedures.”
ASFA has urged greater transparency and fairness in the way superannuation levies are set and spent.
Labor’s re-election has reignited calls to strengthen Australia’s $4.2 trillion super system, with industry bodies urging swift reform amid economic and demographic shifts.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.