The merger with AustralianSuper will provide AGEST Super with strong membership growth, good cash inflows and scale efficiencies, according to AGEST chief executive Cath Bowtell.
"It's not just about being big, it's about being a fund that has strong cash inflows and strong member growth," Bowtell said.
Both funds share a similar investment philosophy, and AustralianSuper has a "good suite of products" that is similar to AGEST's offering, she added.
The selection of AustralianSuper as a merger partner followed a tender process that AGEST commenced in September 2011.
The two funds will now negotiate the implementation of the merger and conduct due diligence on each other, Bowtell said.
"Our board will have to be convinced that the costs to our members are outweighed by the benefits to our members," she said.
One big potential cost in a merger is the potential loss of deferred tax assets, Bowtell said. AGEST has sent a submission to the Government requesting capital gains tax rollover relief to resolve the issue.
But while there are execution costs involved in undergoing a merger, failing to merge could also cost AGEST money, Bowtell said. She cited regulatory costs and the establishment of operational risk reserves in particular.
AGEST has 130,000 members and funds under management (FUM) of $4.3 billion.
The merger will further cement AustralianSuper's position as the largest industry fund in the country, bringing its FUM to $46 billion.
The central bank has served up a disappointment for punters on Melbourne Cup Day.
The superannuation industry will be judged by its member services rather than how effectively it accumulates wealth, according to Stephen Jones.
The profit-to-member super funds are officially operating as a merged entity, set to serve over half a million members.
Super Review announced 21 winners at the annual Super Fund of the Year Awards, including the recipient of the prestigious Fund of the Year Award.