Avanteos pleads guilty for fees-for-no-service charges

8 December 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

Registrable superannuation entity (RSE) licensee, Avanteos Investments Limited has pleaded guilty to 18 criminal charges relating to failures to update defective disclosure statements and continuing to charge fees to deceased superannuation members.

In early 2016, while it was a subsidiary of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Avanteos received legal advice that it did not have authority to deduct fees from super members after their death. ASIC said despite this, Avanteos did not update its disclosure statements and continued deducting these fees until May 2018.

During the period 6 January, 2016, to 1 May, 2018, disclosure statements for 18 super products issued by Avanteos were defective, as they failed to tell super fund members they would be charged adviser service fees after their death.

As a result of the offending, 499 deceased members with funds in these super products were charged almost $700,000 in fees by Avanteos when it was not entitled to do so.

Avanteos’s conduct was the subject of evidence given at the Hayne Royal Commission because of fees for no service.

Avanteos was imposed with additional licence conditions by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in December 2019 and it had since remediated all affected customers.

This matter was the first criminal prosecution under s1021J(1) of the Corporations Act as it was an offence for the preparer of a disclosure document or statement to not take reasonable steps to ensure that a defective disclosure document was not distributed or is not accompanied by information that corrects the deficiency.

The 18 charges were filed today in the County Court, Melbourne, and the matter was next listed for sentencing on 1 June, 2022.

The matter was being prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) after an investigation and referral by ASIC.

The maximum penalty for each offence, which occurred between 2016 and 2018 was $180,000.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by john on Wed, 12/08/2021 - 11:29

In that case then other retail funds like AMP, BT etc are going to be up for $$ millions in fines

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

2 days 23 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

2 days 23 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

3 days ago