The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) will be treating people employed by major financial services conglomerates such as AMP and the Commonwealth Bank in just the same way as union officials and employer representatives for the purposes of determining "independence".
That is the bottom line of a letter sent by APRA to superannuation funds on Friday where the regulator has added its interpretation to the definitions outlined in the Government's exposure draft legislation.
The APRA letter makes clear the regulator believes that some independent directors on "entities within a conglomerate group" would be prevented from serving as an independent director on the superannuation fund board.
In doing so, APRA said it would be supplementing the interpretations within the exposure draft legislation by setting out some of the circumstances which it considers will constitute a material relationship.
"In line with the requirements of CPS 510, APRA proposes to include material professional advisers, consultants, or suppliers as examples of material relationships," it said.
"Further, as outlined in the explanatory guide to the draft legislation, material relationships are likely to include relationships between the RSE [registered superannuation entity] licensee and standard employer sponsors, parent companies, and bodies with the right to nominate potential directors."
Deloitte Access Economics has raised concerns about the government’s recent changes to the Future Fund’s investment mandate, questioning the necessity and implications of the reforms.
An industry body has praised the strong backing from institutional investors for Australia’s transition to renewable energy.
The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remains the “urgent missing piece” of the puzzle.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.