Bill Kelty: Fix wages, not super

29 October 2019
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

Bill Kelty, one of the founders of Australia’s superannuation system under the Keating government, says it wasn’t the superannuation system or superannuation guarantee (SG) that needed to be fixed, but wages for workers.

Speaking at the ‘Superannuation: Rebooting the system that is failing many Australians’ panel at the Crescent Think Tank launch, Kelty said all the discussion around changes to super prevented generational confidence in the system.

“The most important thing to say to working people and the people of Australia is stop all the changes in super, stop all this nonsense, stop threatening it all the time,” Kelty said.

“Leave it alone so the [new] generation can get confidence in the system again.

“It’s not to say there aren’t issues, but people making generational decisions are sick and tired of governments coming in, changing and reviewing it.”

He acknowledged there were still issues for people who were out of the labour force for periods of time, particularly women, as well as for young people who drifted between casual jobs.

“Women are treated unfairly, fix up that issue, but leave the system as it is. Leave the commitments as they were,” Kelty said.

Kelty said the government should follow through on increasing the super guarantee (SG) to 12% as it was originally agreed and to stop deferring changes.

“Not one word was said in the last election about moving the SG to 12%, but now the election is over and suddenly people are having an enquiry.

“We wonder why people lost trust in politics, they got told by no one this was on the agenda.

“Just meet your commitments, do what you told people you would do and implement the 12% and keep your promise.

“Leave super, fix up wages, don’t continue to steal money and steal super off decent working people, because that’s all that argument is.”

Former Liberal opposition leader, John Hewson, said assistant minister for superannuation, financial services and financial technology, Senator Jane Hume’s, proposal for a 10% SG would be inadequate.

“I think it’s ridiculous to imagine you can set a policy by saying this is a nice round number, because I don’t think that makes any sense at all,” Hewson said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 2 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 2 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 2 months ago

 What is CSC and how does its investment strategy stand out?Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (CSC) is a retirement benefits provider for members of the Austra...

1 day ago

What were the key factors that influenced your fund's performance in 2024, and how did market conditions impact your investment strategy?UniSuper’s Balanced (default) opt...

1 day ago

APRA has announced eight proposals aimed at pushing entities, including super funds, to move beyond treating compliance with certain requirements as a mere box-ticking ex...

1 day 1 hour ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS