Bowen puts underperforming funds on notice

21 March 2019
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen, has hit out at the Morrison Government for failing to bring legislation that would allow the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to shut down underperforming superannuation funds to a parliamentary vote.

Well and truly in election campaign mode, Bowen used a speech to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia today to cement Labor’s position as an advocate for low and middle-income earners in retirement.

The speech also served to put superannuation funds on notice that, following themes pursued by both the Productivity Commission and the Banking Royal Commission last year, a Labor Federal Government would focus any superannuation legislation firmly on member outcomes.

"Right now, there is a bill in the Parliament which would require super funds to report on their performance compared to similar products," Bowen said, blaming the Government “preferring politics over policy” for the fact it hadn’t come to a vote.

"Labor amended this bill in the Senate to make the outcomes test tougher, make director penalties higher and make APRA's powers stronger … If a fund is consistently underperforming it will receive no sympathy and will be dealt with by a Shorten Labor government, regardless of which part of the superannuation system it comes from."

Bowen also said that superannuation wasn’t working as well as it should be for low-income workers, but believed the solution lay in improving the superannuation system rather than looking for a new one. He took the same stance on default insurance, saying that he was looking for a better way to deal with its problems.

The potential treasurer-in-waiting accused the Government of spending “too much of its energy on its ideological war on industry super funds” rather than addressing these issues. He said that until laws giving APRA greater powers to shut down low performers passed, Australians would continue to be “ripped off”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by John M on Fri, 03/22/2019 - 16:22

What a retard. For a true comparison Chris Bowen, why don't we do a risk adjusted analysis on performance and then when the ISA funds are 'lower performing' will you back door them?

He's worse than a catholic cardinal around alter boys when it comes to the truth and money to be made from getting their sticky hands on everyone's super savings.

Appreciate if you didn't insult or offend by including comments about physical limitations and implied abuse - you can make your point without being disrespectful.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

19 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

20 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

21 hours ago