Call for fund managers to charge flat fee

12 November 2009
| By Caroline Munro |

A letter sent out to about 500 fund managers has suggested that they change their fee models to better align interests between investors and fund managers, as unskilled managers currently benefit disproportionately in market growth.

Frontier Investment Consulting managing director Fiona Trafford-Walker suggested that managers change their fee models so they are paid a “flat-dollar fee, with an annual inflation ratchet”, that goes towards covering the fund manager’s business costs. Thereafter, should the fund perform well, they would receive a performance-based fee.

Trafford-Walker said the most common fee structure is that fund managers are paid based on assets under management. She said the problem with this fee structure is that there is often little correlation with the returns to the client.

“Under this structure, fund managers benefit disproportionately as the market goes up but also see revenues fall substantially as the market does,” she stated in the letter.

Trafford-Walker added that she does not accept the argument that the costs to fund managers in managing larger portfolios rise as strongly as costs paid by the client.

She said a negative for fund managers in using this model is that when markets fall, staff are often laid off to recover costs, leaving remaining managers fearful of losing their jobs rather than focusing on managing portfolios, while also having to cope with reduced resources. Ultimately, it is the client who is disadvantaged.

“The reality of a rising market is that many managers generate large fees from general market growth rather than actually delivering outperformance for clients,” Trafford-Walker said. “Poorly performing managers can go on for some years with no excess returns but still make lots of money for themselves and none for the client above an index return.”

She said poor markets expose these people, yet a change in the model to a flat fee to cover costs and a performance fee to actually reward performance would be an attractive proposition to skilled managers, who could actually earn more under such a fee structure.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 3 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 3 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 3 months ago

In what is being called a coordinated cyber attack, a number of Australia’s largest superannuation funds have suffered a breach with thousands of user accounts compromise...

15 hours 49 minutes ago

Donald Trump’s tariff blitz has shaken global markets, fuelling uncertainty over trade retaliation, recession, and economic fallout, while Australia, though bruised, esca...

17 hours ago

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor has vowed to slash red tape and introduce a suite of financial services reforms aimed at transforming Australia into a leading financial hub...

1 day 16 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS