Call for removal of barriers to post-retirement products

10 October 2013
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government should legislate to remove regulatory barriers which impede product innovation in the post-retirement space, particularly with respect to annuity-type products, according to new research released by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).  

The research, released this week, claims the current governing legislation, Superannuation Industry (Supervision) (SIS) regulations, “are very focused on post-retirement products that are currently in the market, and severely limit the scope for innovation and new products”.  

“New supportive regulations should set out general requirements which are not linked to specific products, such that it is a principles-based framework,” the ASFA research analysis said.  

“The regulation of income streams has, to date, remained dependent on individual product characterisation (for example, account-based, lifetime, residual capital value) rather than one set of acceptable principles for income streams (that is, regular drawdown regardless of whether payments commence immediately or at a future point of time),” it said.  

The ASFA analysis said such product-based characterisations drove legislative difficulty in arriving at a consistent view and treatment of different types of income streams.  

“This issue is clearly demonstrated through the classification (or lack thereof) of deferred and variable annuities in the context of SIS legislation and regulations and the tax law.”  

The analysis said deferred annuities were one example of an innovative product solution, but there were many other potential products and solutions and that, accordingly, any regulatory barriers which impeded product innovation and the development of longevity risk solutions to consumers should be removed.  

“In particular, the regulations should permit products which offer a deferred benefit, by ensuring that deferred annuities and like products are:  

  • eligible for the benefits tax exemption for persons over aged 60 years and over  
  • not subject to undue restrictions, such as those requiring an individual, over a specific age, to satisfy a work test before they are able to purchase such a product with non-superannuation monies  
  • unambiguous exemption from the minimum drawdown rules during the deferral period. Regulations should also contemplate products which have all, or some, of the following characteristics:  

- mitigate longevity risk, but aren’t necessarily lifetime guarantees  

- are paid for incrementally  

- are reversible to the extent that any remaining assets are available, but the 'longevity premiums’ paid to date are not  

- are linked to an allocated pension and form a back-to-back contract for the investor, thereby providing a single income stream. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Westpac has delayed its rate cut forecast, aligning with its peer NAB’s outlook on the likely trajectory for the Reserve Bank of Australia’s cash rate....

6 hours ago

The government’s adjustment to the Future Fund’s mandate could set a dangerous precedent, warns an economist, raising concerns that it may pave the way for problematic fu...

5 hours ago

The proposed reforms have been described as a key step towards delivering better products and retirement experiences for members, with many noting financial advice remain...

7 hours ago