The global economy should avoid slipping into another recession, but the biggest risk facing markets is poor investor sentiment and the resulting negative feedback loops, according to Credit Suisse.
Recent falls in global equity markets are on a similar scale to the falls beginning in April, last year, according to Credit Suisse head of UK research and portfolio analysis Michael O'Sullivan. However, whereas the falls last year took three months to reach their trough, "we've done all of that in about two weeks", he said.
With the caveat that equity markets sometimes overestimate the likelihood of recessions, O'Sullivan said most indicators painted a grim picture.
"If you look at Treasury prices, if you look at the price of gold, if you look at equity prices they are reflecting recession-type levels. So the equity market is saying we're going to have a 25-30 per cent fall in earnings," he said.
However, O'Sullivan said Credit Suisse believed "we're going to see a slowdown in growth, not a double-dip". The current expansion period is in line with other historical episodes, and the recent falls in stock markets are not unusual in that context. The median post WW2 expansion period for the US is 52 weeks, O'Sullivan added - whereas the current expansion period is only 26 weeks old.
The biggest problem is poor sentiment, and the possibility of investors talking themselves into a recession, he said. He pointed to Internet searches for the keyword 'double-dip', which he said had just reached an all-time high and historically had a reasonably strong inverse relationship with global equity markets.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.