![]() |
Monetary penalties imposed against self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) that fail to meet their legal compliance requirements should not be so high as to wipe them out, according to the Taxation Institute of Australia.
In a submission to the Cooper Review, the institute has recommended a review of the penalty regime applying to SMSFs, including the manner in which the top marginal tax rate is applied.
It said this regime should be changed so that the top marginal rate was applied only during the financial years that a fund remains non-complying.
"If an extra monetary penalty above this needs to be imposed, then the Taxation Institute has suggested that it be in line with having a deterrent effect, but not a punishment so large that it wipes out almost half of a taxpayer's retirement savings," the submission said.
The Institute said the monetary amount could be in the order of around $10,000 to $20,000 or based on a scale of the assets in the fund.
Governor Michele Bullock took a more hawkish stance on Tuesday, raising concerns over Donald Trump’s escalating tariffs, which sent economists in different directions with their predictions.
Equity Trustees has announced the appointment of Jocelyn Furlan to the Superannuation Limited (ETSL) and HTFS Nominees Pty Ltd (HTFS) boards, which have oversight of one of the companies’ fastest growing trustee services.
Following growing criticism of the superannuation industry’s influence on capital markets and its increasing exposure to private assets, as well as regulators’ concerns about potential risks to financial stability, ASFA has released new research pushing back on these narratives.
A US-based infrastructure specialist has welcomed the $93 billion fund as a cornerstone investor.