Choice heatmap will purge weaker products: APRA

5 January 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has indicated that the 2021 Choice Heatmap will drive the removal of weaker products, options and funds from the industry.

Speaking at an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) briefing, APRA member, Margaret Cole, heralded the expansion of the heat maps to choice options as an important step to improving transparency and member outcomes.

“Our active supervision of underperforming MySuper products over the last two years has driven substantial benefits to members in the shape of reduced fees or members moving or being moved into better performing funds,” Cole said.

APRA had utilised data from SuperRatings to look at more than 700 multi sector investment options representing 40% of total member benefits in the choice sector and found 60% of choice funds this year failed to deliver returns above the heatmap benchmark.

Meanwhile 45% of MySuper products delivered returns below APRA’s heatmap benchmark.

“Some areas of significant underperformance are clearly evident and impacting a higher proportion of products than in MySuper,” Cole said.

“We intend to expand the coverage of the choice heatmap in coming years in line with the expansion of the super data collections we are receiving.

“No doubt some will quibble about what has been left out this time around, but I encourage you to put your focus on what we've been able to capture which you'll see has unearthed some interesting results.”

She said most trustees in the choice heatmap had more than one investment option that had failed APRAs benchmark but concerningly, a small handful of trustees held products in which at least half or all had failed.

Cole said the next step for trustees was to improve member engagement and assess the outcomes they were delivering to members.

“The heatmap shows that many trustees will need to explain why their choice investment options underperformed peers and benchmarks, why their fees are so much higher than others and what changes they're going to make to fix this,” she said.

“I have heard from some trustee board members and senior executives how very difficult getting strong member engagement is, and I can recognise that.

“But super funds pay close attention to member engagement when it comes to attracting new members, so I feel sure all these highly intelligent driven people can find a way.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year ago

Super funds had a “tremendous month” in November, according to new data....

3 days 11 hours ago

Australia faces a decade of deficits, with the sum of deficits over the next four years expected to overshoot forecasts by $21.8 billion....

3 days 17 hours ago

It seems the government is still determined to push through its controversial super tax legislation, according to its Tax Expenditures and Insights Statement released tod...

4 days 7 hours ago