POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
The dangers of extra super withdrawal
Making extra withdrawals from superannuation every year could still cause problems for members, according Bob Locke from SMSF specialist Practical Systems Super, despite there not being a maximum withdrawal amount.
While members must drawdown a minimum amount from their super each year, the way additional payments were taken could have significant implications.
Say a super member chose to take an additional pension amount of $200,000 from their retirement phase pension account, then the transfer balance cap would remain the same. When they contributed the $200,000, it would have to remain in accumulation phase and the related portion of income and capital gains derived from that portion will be subject to ongoing tax.
Alternatively, if they commute $200,000 of their retirement phase pension account back to accumulation phase and withdraw a lump sum, the transfer balance cap will reduce by $200,000. When the amount is recontributed, a further retirement phase pension can then be started so the entire fund is exempt from tax on all income and capital gains.
Locke said the difference between two methods highlighted opting for pension commutations could have a beneficial effect on finances.
“The takeout here is that where contemplating any significant additional pension withdrawals (beyond the minimum requirement), you would generally be wise to arrange these as a commutation back to retirement phase and then make a lump sum withdrawal.
“Note there are reporting obligations in relation to pension commutations and you should consider seeking professional advice where appropriate.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
