The threat of sequencing risk is leaving retirees and pre-retirees in danger when there is a market collapse, according to Cor Capital.
This was because, not only did they lose out during the collapse, their age meant there was minimal time for them to regain their losses, known as sequencing risk.
It was particularly in the case in the recent crash as it followed a particularly long bull run for equities and investors had become complacent with receiving high returns.
Tom Rachoff, director at fund management firm Cor Capital, said: “Sequencing risk represents the danger of experiencing poor investment performance at the worst time. While some investors have decades to ride out volatility and heavy capital losses, investors nearing and in retirement are not among them.
“They need to pay greater attention to the risk of permanent capital loss and the sequence of returns while still attempting to maximise return.”
With superannuation funds being tilted towards growth assets and unlisted assets such as infrastructure, this sold off in a market downturn. This was the opposite of what investors had expected the funds would do as many believed their focus had been on capital protection.
Rachoff said: “Many of these investors did not realise that they were ‘at risk,’ and were sitting on a rollercoaster ride through the sequencing risk zone, with a better-than-even chance of succumbing to human behaviour if markets got stressed. And they got very stressed.
“Ideally the pre-retiree and retired investors would have a portfolio that can perform well in a bull market phase, but more importantly, work to protect capital within the extreme ‘risk off’ environments.”
The industry fund has upped its investment in start-ups, helping to unlock the benefits of innovation and emerging technologies.
The chair of the Future Fund has slammed critics of the sovereign wealth’s new mandate as “factually incorrect”.
Super Review understands the Division 296 legislation could be facing the chopping block, with Labor said to be struggling to secure support ahead of the final sitting week of the year.
Deloitte Access Economics has raised concerns about the government’s recent changes to the Future Fund’s investment mandate, questioning the necessity and implications of the reforms.