Do insolvent directors really care about the SG?

2 May 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Personal liability for superannuation guarantee (SG) appears to be of little consequence to directors who find themselves in trouble, according to the Australian Institute of Credit Management (AICM).

In a submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into superannuation guarantee non-payment, the AICM non-reporting of (SG) obligations was a common method employed by businesses experiencing insolvency issues.

“Further, while companies may cease payment of the SG before most other creditors this is generally not evident until a formal insolvency appointment, meanwhile creditors have continued to provide credit to these businesses unaware of the breach of a fundamental obligation,” it said.

The submission said that due to the hidden nature of the default, credit providers were unable to mitigate the risk inherent in these businesses.

“This issue is further compounded by the fact that although directors face personal liability for the superannuation guarantee and other debts incurred whilst insolvent this does not deter most directors,” it said.

Referring to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) data suggesting that insolvent trading occurred in 60 per cent of cases, the AICM said such statistics “indicate that the majority of directors when faced with potential insolvency are not concerned about their personal liability and are operating under one of three approaches:

  • They are optimistic about their ability to recovery to a solvency
  • The threat of insolvent trading liability pales in comparison with their other personal liabilities that will arise on liquidation of the business meaning there is no downside to trading whilst insolvent as a claim will only add to their already significant deficit
  • They may be willing to run the risk of insolvent trading known that ASIC is unlikely to prosecute and claims from liquidators are unlikely or can be frustrated by complicated and costly litigation.

“Considering there is very limited recovery and/or enforcement of director’s liability, the cost of insolvent trading is borne by creditors and the practice continues to increase,” the AICM submission said.

“It is clear that ensuring better compliance with SG obligations and enforcement of non-compliance will significantly improve the outcomes intended by the SG but also reduce the impacts of insolvent businesses, creditors and the Australian economy generally.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 8 hours ago