POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Don’t penalise disengaged members: APRA
Members who are disengaged should not be disadvantaged and superannuation funds have a duty to provide members with clear information, according to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).
Speaking at the Fund Executive Associations Limited Members’ discussion forum, APRA executive member, Margaret Cole, said fewer members were engaged with their super fund as she had hoped.
She said super funds had a duty to ensure all members received clear, concise information which would improve member engagement and understanding of the super system.
“I would like to see more done to make sure that members get the benefit of clear, concise information in plain English,” she said.
“Information that is clear, independent of any political nuance, and aimed at capturing members’ attention, helping them understand how important this issue is for their and their families’ financial futures.”
Super funds should also be able to demonstrate and justify how their work, including brand promotion to reach new members, was in the best interest and benefit of current members.
“Being disengaged doesn’t mean a member should be disadvantaged. You need to constantly ask yourselves the question who are you here to serve and how are you prioritising the interests of your members.”
This came to light as a report by KPMG found that four out of five members of a merged fund were unaware their fund had merged and received information from their super fund on a quarterly, or less, basis.
Cole also many funds in the super system lacked scale and effective rivalry, demonstrated by the fact that many small funds would have disappeared by now if there was. This was despite much merger activity taking place in recent years and talk of mega funds on the horizon.
“116 or about 80% of APRA-regulated entities collectively manage a disproportionately small percentage (8%) of the total assets,” Cole said.
“At the other extreme, 13 funds with assets of greater than $50 billion collectively manage around 70% of assets.
“If there were effective rivalry and true competition in this market, many small and/or underperforming trustees would have disappeared off the list by now.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Laura Dew is editor at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she spent five years working at Investment Week in the UK covering asset and wealth management.
Recommended for you
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
