The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) has defended the equal representation of employers and employees on the boards of not-for-profit superannuation funds, which have been publicly criticised for being union dominated.
Opening the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) in Brisbane, AIST chief executive Fiona Reynolds claimed the not-for-profit equal representation model had been placed under attack by vested interests.
It was a claim backed by AIST president Gerard Noonan, who claimed the equal representation model was capable of withstanding more scrutiny than that applying to the 'for-profit' sector.
However, it was Reynolds who argued that the governance model applying to banks and other financial institutions were not suited to the not-for-profit funds sector.
She said the requirements with respect to not-for-profit funds were "fundamentally different", but nonetheless delivered transparency and disclosure.
"Profit before member interests is the ulterior motive of our critics," she said.
"The benefits which flow from the not-for-profit sector are clear for everyone to see, and were achieved via equal employee and employer representation on trustee boards," Reynolds said.
She said those who were arguing for change had yet to provide justification for their claims.
The industry super fund has been ordered to pay $23.5 million after systemic failures caused extensive delays for thousands of insurance claimants.
A new report from the prudential regulator has revealed super funds can act as both a stabilising force and an amplifier of shocks in an interconnected economy.
CFS has expanded usage of its digital advice product to members of its employer super and FirstChoice super accounts.
Superannuation funds are expanding their activities in the advice space and a leading recruitment firm has shared the typical salaries on offer with three funds namechecked for their attractive offerings.