POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Fix contribution caps says accounting firm
The Federal Government has been urged to review the process of assessing concessional superannuation contributions in circumstances where existing arrangements are complicated and don’t work.
Accounting and financial services firm, BDO has used its pre-Budget submission to the Treasury to point out the shortcoming of the existing superannuation taxation regime, and to also call for the replacement of annual contribution caps with lifetime contribution caps based on numbers which are “meaningful to allow a person and their family to be self-sufficient in retirement”.
The BDO submission pointed to research over a number of years which it said showed that taxpayers do not appreciate the continual ‘tinkering’ with the superannuation tax system
It said that taxpayers also perceived that the current contribution caps arrangements did not appropriately incentivise them to save for their own retirement.
“In particular, they are concerned that the contributions cap restricts them from saving for their retirement during the years in which such saving is financially affordable for them,” the submission said. “Much of the policy of the superannuation system should be that taxpayers save for their retirement progressively during the years that they are earning income, [but] it is simply not affordable for the vast majority of the taxpaying community to do so.”
“In this regard, we submit that the level at which the concessional contributions cap is set should be reviewed in light of evidence (either to be collected or, if already collected, to be made public) on the adequacy of such savings for a range of scenarios having regard to the effect of capping,” the submission said.
The BDO submission also noted that the interaction of the superannuation guarantee legislation and the concessional superannuation deduction capping measures meant that certain highly paid workers who were employed by two unrelated employers were subject to excess contributions tax which they could not cannot avoid.
“For example, a contract CFO paid $150,000 per year by each of two companies will incur an excess contributions tax liability based solely upon the required superannuation guarantee contributions from each of those companies,” it said. “The imposition of a punitive tax that is unable to be avoided reduces confidence in the integrity of the system. In our view this anomaly should be fixed.”
Recommended for you
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.
Australia’s second-largest super fund is prioritising impact investing with a $2 billion commitment, targeting assets that deliver a combination of financial, social, and environmental outcomes.
The super fund has significantly grown its membership following the inclusion of Zurich’s OneCare Super policyholders.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
76.97 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
76.46 3 y p.a(%)
3
UBS Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF Dis USD
51.13 3 y p.a(%)
4
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
45.15 3 y p.a(%)
5
Select Baker steel Gold Institutional
43.78 3 y p.a(%)
So BDO suggest tinkering with the existing superannuation tax regime, and at the same time, highlight that taxpayers don't appreciate continual tinkering with the existing superannuation tax regime.