Superannuation funds need to align different committees on how their internal audit will function, according to Deloitte director of financial services assurance and advisory, James Oliver.
"Within your organisations, you have the board committee, the board, executive management, the board management group, and you have the internal auditors themselves, and each of those parties may have a slightly different view of internal audit," Oliver said at an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) breakfast in Melbourne.
Frank discussions between all parties involved were necessary to come to that alignment, he said, as things would inevitably go wrong if it didn't happen.
It was important for super funds to reach a consensus on their purpose and remit before they started their internal audit function, according to Oliver.
Funds with internal audit functions already in place may need to unwind them to achieve the consensus that was necessary, he warned.
However a clear charter towards that purpose may take some of the hassle out of having to rework internal audit processes.
Oliver said the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority had introduced the internal audit requirement because the industry was growing and becoming more complex, while funds had moved into the non-super space; were in-sourcing complex investment management; and building digital and social media strategies.
Super funds have built on early financial year momentum, as growth funds deliver strong results driven by equities and resilient bonds.
The super fund has announced that Mark Rider will step down from his position of chief investment officer (CIO) after deciding to “semi-retire” from full-time work.
Rest has joined forces with alternative asset manager Blue Owl Capital, co-investing in a real estate trust, with the aim of capitalising on systemic changes in debt financing.
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.