Fix lifecycle investments, don’t ban them

6 September 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

While the Productivity Commission (PC) has taken a negative view of lifecycle superannuation products, they should not be dismissed out of hand, according to actuarial research house, Rice Warner.

In an analysis published this week, Rice Warner has maintained that not all lifecylcle products are created equal and that the results of the PC’s modelling are a symptom of design, not an encumbrance of the concept.

It said that, on this basis, it did not believe the PC’s findings should be allowed to result in a ban on lifecycle investments.

“Arguably, a lifecycle product with a full allocation to growth in the formative years, de-risking to the ‘more appropriate’ balanced fund supported by the PC ten years out from retirement will produce superior results, with only a marginal increase in risk for the member,” the Rice Warner analysis argued.

“Alternatively, members could move money into a cash account for any lump sum required at retirement and the first year’s pension payments,” it said.  “This will allow them to keep high levels of growth assets as they will not need to draw down on the main account, so they are immunised against a market shock at the time of retirement.”

The Rice Warner analysis suggested that technology, particularly improvements in administration and member services, were driving a trend towards smarter, more personalised defaults and that some funds were already providing or considering lifecycle products that varied with balance and age.

“Access to more data will allow funds to segment membership into homogenous groups using age, gender and account balance as relevant factors,” it said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by Bear on Thu, 09/06/2018 - 13:25

would have been nice to get a summary of what the PC had a problem with to give some context. Is this written on the expectation everyone has read the PC mike?

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 17 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 17 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 18 hours ago