Flexible governance structure needed

2 June 2020
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

In unprecedented times like the COVID-19 pandemic a governance structure that is flexible will allow superannuation funds to respond better, according to a panel. 

Speaking at on an online Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) session, State Super (SAS Trustee Corporation) chief executive, John Livanas, said governance risk could create its own set of problems in the current environment. 

Livanas said compliance that had a very limited set of backwards-looking requirements could create risk on a forward-looking basis by constraining people from having the ability to respond.  

“Typically, in situations like this [COVID-19] what you want is maximum degrees of freedom as constraining people artificially based on some historical premise is certainly most unhelpful,” he said. 

He said State Super wanted to give employees “as much structure within a structure that could be unstructured”. 

“We had significant areas or ranges which the investments people could move and we did pretty well in manging those range,” he said. 

“But in order to do that we needed a governance structure that was recorded and had a logical set of parameters that went through an organised discussion to create a decision.” 

Livanas said once the decision was made the fund was able to immediately take action. 

“We’ve been able to move that flexibility to our benefit and respond really quickly. In terms of risk to the organisation, we make sure people know their capacity to move – that their degree of freedom has also expanded,” he said. 

“So, decision making authority levels all have been increased. Knowing that at the end of the day you’re running the business with equal limits rather than a business with processes.” 

He noted that this kind of governance structure along with working remotely had allowed for greater productivity since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“We’ve moved to an emergency management investment committee meeting every day for half an hour. In that timeframe we look at liquidity, operations issues, and how the portfolio is positioned. Within in 30 minutes we make a decision to do something or nothing,” he said. 

“Nothing more complicated than that and it’s amazing the level of conversation that takes place. If you’ve got good people you’re able to have an incredible set of thoughts. This governance structure works for us.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

21 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

21 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

22 hours ago