The Government's move to remove tax disincentives for private investors in infrastructure will make for "more certain investment for superannuation funds", according to Financial Services Council chief executive John Brogden.
Assistant Treasurer Bill Shorten and Minister for Infrastructure Anthony Albanese yesterday announced the release of a discussion paper on the 2011-12 Budget measure to introduce new rules for tax losses that are attributable to designated infrastructure projects.
Brogden welcomed the discussion paper, along with the Government's decision to give Infrastructure Australia the responsibility for creating a 'top down' priority list.
"The Government's decision to give Infrastructure Australia the mandate and resources to review the causes of recently failed infrastructure projects will assist in the development of appropriate risk sharing models for investment," said Brogden.
Shorten said the proposed tax rules would give private investors more flexibility to claim losses, making infrastructure investment more attractive.
The draft paper follows FSC-commissioned research by Ernst & Young that found there were many barriers to infrastructure investment that needed to be removed, including making transactional processes that are transparent and consistent across states.
"The Federal Government can also play a role in developing regulatory and transactional processes that are transparent and consistent across states," Brogden said.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.