The Government has heeded calls from the industry to provide capital gains tax (CGT) rollover relief for merging superannuation funds, effective from 1 July 2012 to 1 July 2017.
The mandatory transfer of default members' balances to a MySuper product in another complying fund will also be eligible for the tax relief, as of 1 July 2013 to 1 July 2017.
A Financial Services Council (FSC) statement said the existing tax laws required losses during the global financial crisis to be crystallised when two funds chose to merge.
"Trustees could not - in accordance with their legislative duty to act in the best interest of members - go ahead with a merger under those circumstances," said the FSC.
Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) chief executive Pauline Vamos also welcomed the change, which comes after intense lobbying by ASFA.
"Super funds are currently carrying deferred tax assets equivalent to between 1 and 3 per cent of member account balances," Vamos said.
"Without the CGT rollover relief, the fund member would bear the brunt of the outcome, as efficiency gains from a merger would not be realised," she said.
MLC and NAB Wealth Group executive Steve Tucker also welcomed the announcement.
"The extension of this relief for merging superannuation funds will result in a better outcome for members' retirement benefits," Tucker said.
Self-managed superannuation funds will be excluded from the tax loss relief "because the MySuper requirements do not apply to them", according to the Government.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.