POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Government-run super fund a ‘dud’ idea
Industry Super Australia (ISA) thinks a proposed government-run super fund would be rife for pork-barrelling and will “dud” workers out of thousands of dollars.
Its modelling showed that a 30-year-old worker in such a government-run fund would pay exorbitant fees, earn lower investment returns and end up $126,000 worse off at retirement compared with being in a top-performing industry fund.
“This plan would funnel millions of Australian workers into an expensive and poor performing government-controlled super fund – all so politicians can get their hands on people’s money,” ISA chief executive, Bernie Dean, said.
Earlier this year, Liberal senator Andrew Bragg reignited the national fund debate when he said the Government should “take its responsibilities more seriously” by making the Future Fund the default fund.
If the government-run fund was to go ahead, new workers would be entered into it by default unless they opted to join a different fund.
ISA said their modelling reinforced earlier evidence from the Productivity Commission (PC) that a government-run super fund would be prone to political interference and riddled with conflicts of interest.
“With almost unchecked power to spend workers’ savings, [the Government] could find it hard to resist ladling out money for pork barrels in marginal seats, all for the purpose of chasing votes rather than good investment returns,” ISA said.
According to ISA, political ideology could also trump the financial interest of members especially when a government makes itself the investment officer, trustee, owner, regulator and supervisor.
The ISA supported the PC’s earlier research which found internationally government-run super funds invested conservatively as few governments could withstand the political risk of negative returns during market downturns, leading to less money at retirement and more pressure on the Aged Pension.
“And if the government-fund delivered lousy investment returns the taxpayer would be expected to bail it out – which combined with the higher pensions costs is a recipe for higher taxes,” ISA said.
Recommended for you
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI Second Close
61.07 3 y p.a(%)
2
Spire Oaktree Opportunities XI First Close USD
59.21 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.56 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.06 3 y p.a(%)
5
DomaCom 4/27 Crombie Avenue Bundall QLD 4217 Australia
26.81 3 y p.a(%)
