Govt's infrastructure incentives miss target

15 December 2011
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Government may have missed the mark by proposing legislation to provide tax loss incentives around infrastructure projects, according to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).

In a submission lodged with the Treasury dealing with the proposed changes, ASFA chief executive Pauline Vamos said that while the proposed changes sought to ameliorate the cost of losses being "trapped" for a an extended period, they did not address the more significant issue of the possibility of losses being permanently incurred through the failure of a project.

"The major beneficiaries of the proposed tax incentives, in ASFA's view, are more likely to be the construction companies, financiers, promoters of large infrastructure projects than superannuation funds as the eventual long-term owners of the infrastructure assets," the submission said.

The ASFA submission said the superannuation funds' decision to invest in an infrastructure asset was primarily based on the income generated by the asset, and therefore tax losses were unlikely to occur during the fund's ownership.

The submission pointed out that the law required that the primary consideration of superannuation funds was the likely investment return and the level of risk.

"The goal of superannuation funds is investment for profit, not loss," it said. "The fact than an infrastructure project is large (greater than $100 million) or is considered to be of national significance does not alter a trustee's duty when investing in such projects."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 1 month ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 1 month ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 1 month ago

While the controversial measures have received little support in the Senate, the think tank has said Division 296 would “make the nation’s super system fairer”....

16 hours ago

In its pre-election policy document, the FSC highlighted 15 priority reforms, with superannuation featuring prominently, urging both major parties to avoid changing super...

16 hours ago

With the merger between Mine Super and TWUSuper in its late stages, the head of the soon-to-be combined fund is the latest to join ASFA’s board. ...

17 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS