CareSuper chief executive Julie Lander has warned there is a big difference between a member controlling their own money compared to administering their own fund.
The complexity of reporting, compliance requirements and high costs associated with self-managed super funds (SMSFs) could result in greater financial pressures for retirees.
"Many investors attracted to establishing an SMSF have little understanding of ongoing compliance costs and the severe fines they potentially face if they don't comply with a raft of complex regulatory requirements," Lander said.
Adviser fees pushed costs up even further, according to Lander.
"What brings this cost into question is that a majority of SMSFs are invested in cash, term deposits and Australian equities," she said.
"These investment options are available via CareSuper at a fraction of the cost."
The not-for-profit super fund launched a direct investment option last December in response to the needs of investors who did not want the burden of trustee obligations.
The ASX300 investment option will be expanded to include term deposits, exchange-traded funds and listed securities this year.
Other funds to incorporate direct investment options include Club Plus Super, AustralianSuper, legalsuper and Telstra Super.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.