A significant number of Australians are unlikely to achieve adequate retirement incomes after all sources of savings are considered, according to research by Towers Watson and The University of Melbourne.
The data reveals only 53 per cent of couples and 22 per cent of singles are set to have a comfortable level of retirement income even when compulsory superannuation, voluntary superannuation, the age pension and other retirement savings not held in superannuation are taken into account.
The research is a sample of Australians aged 40 to 64 targeted by the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey. The analysis determined a fixed dollar amount as a target retirement income, based on the ASFA Retirement Standard 'Comfortable’ level - which is currently $57,655 for couples and $42,158 for singles.
Australians in this age group will be heavily reliant on retirement savings outside superannuation and the age pension, the research states.
If non-super retirement savings are excluded, the levels drop to just 32 per cent of couples and 11 per cent of singles on track to achieve a comfortable level of retirement income.
Furthermore, if the age pension is also excluded, only 15 per cent of couples and 5 per cent of singles are expected to meet the ASFA Retirement Standard.
Towers Watson senior consultant John Burnett advocates providing all superannuation fund members with a retirement projection every year. He believes this is a significant step in educating members about the retirement income shortfall they may be facing, as online calculators and financial planners are unlikely to solve this gap alone.
“The research highlights how important it is for superannuation fund members to be aware of their projected retirement income, but this information is currently not being provided regularly by most funds. While super savings are only part of the equation, this is the logical starting point. Members then need to take retirement income from other sources into account,” Burnett said.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.