Have Govt bonds and fixed interest become problematic?

15 September 2020
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Superannuation fund members and retirees have been cautioned against too closely embracing fixed interest products and Government bonds, with actuarial research house Rice Warner warning of the possibility of negative real returns. 

In an analysis published this week, Rice Warner has pointed to the traditional use of fixed interest assets in providing stability and capita protection but has warned that this may no longer be appropriate given that interest rates have reached record low levels and may reduce even further. 

“Over the last six months, rates have reduced even further and there are signs that ultra- low rates will be around for an extended period,” it said. 

“In line with falls in interest rates, expectations of the long-term returns that will be achieved by Fixed Income and Cash style assets have reduced,” it said. “For example, the expected long term (10-year) return on Australian Government bonds and Cash fell over the last year from 3.5% to 1.4% and from 3.0% to 1.6% respectively.  While there are a range of factors driving this change, it does imply most now perceive a continuation of the very low Reserve Bank Cash Rate for the foreseeable future.” 

“While this downward shift is considerable, it is severe when we look at returns after inflation. These changes imply that fixed interest investments will realise a negative real return over the next decade and therefore reduce the purchasing power of investors,” the Rice Warner analysis said. 

“In the context of superannuation, where most members have a long-term investment horizon, sustained low returns are worrisome,” it said. 

“For conservative members (including many retirees), higher allocations to assets such as fixed income and cash will limit the benefit that they can expect to receive from investment returns, particularly when compounded over a lifetime.  In extreme cases, high allocations to defensive assets may mean that the real value of a member’s balance is eroded over time.” 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 5 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 5 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 6 hours ago