High-yield bonds are a good alternative to equities, particularly in a low-growth global economic environment, according to Artio Global Investors senior portfolio manager Patrick Maldari.
It makes sense to own the balance sheet (ie, credit) of companies in the current environment, since it is an investment that doesn't require a lot of top-line revenue growth, he said.
"In a slow-growth environment companies have a tremendous amount of flexibility in their capital structure to lay off workers or to forgo capital expenditures, so they can manage their balance sheets and pay their creditors," Maldari said.
While high-yield debt has traditionally been viewed as a risky form of fixed income, it made more sense for institutional investors to view it as an alternative to equities.
"High yield is probably one of the most misunderstood asset classes, because it is senior to equity - the first loss piece when a company goes bankrupt is equity," Maldari said.
The term 'junk bond' has created an aura around high yield that it is a risky sector, when in reality it is no more risky than equities in many cases, Maldari said.
With the current focus on dividends and income-yielding assets, it makes sense to invest in assets that perform well in low-growth environments, he added.
"Because [high yield] has so much income there is this ability to mitigate a lot of the volatility when it comes to interest rate risk or credit risk - or even when volatile markets are dominating investors' mindsets," Maldari said.
The Future Fund’s CIO Ben Samild has announced his resignation, with his deputy to assume the role of interim CIO.
The fund has unveiled reforms to streamline death benefit payments, cut processing times, and reduce complexity.
A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the people running it are trustworthy, disciplined, and able to deliver for members in the future.
AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affected members.