How can funds mitigate the risk of illiquid assets?

11 April 2023
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

A possible way to mitigate the risk of investing in illiquid markets could be by limiting the ability of members to switch between investment options, according to State Street.

Speaking to the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST), David Grose, head of alternatives-Australia at State Street, said there were benefits to investing in private markets, but they came with liquidity risks. 

Therefore, he said, it was important to consider structural and governance changes that might arise for a fund and how they would affect those assets. 

“Ultimately, as long as there’s a mismatch between the liquidity of the underlying investments and the liquidity offered to members, some of these risks will inevitably continue to exist,” Grose said.

Two options suggested could be limiting members’ ability to switch between different investment options or implementing a delay, which would reduce problems with investors trading on outdated prices.

“Regulators could encourage super funds to limit the ability of members to freely transfer between different investment options. I’d question whether the majority of members have a real need to switch between investment options more than once or twice a year, which is permitted at the moment.

“If a limit was placed on this and on transferring between different funds, it would reduce the problems caused by investors trading on old prices for private market assets.”

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) introduced SPS 530 Investment Governance in Superannuation last year, and it was hoped this would resolve some challenges posed by illiquid assets and improve funds’ governance.

The paper covered issues such as stress testing, valuations and liquidity management.

Stress testing was likely to be more difficult, Grose said, if a fund held private market investments as they were less transparent than those in a public market. 

“SPS 530 really requires them to demonstrate that they’ve satisfied themselves in relation to appropriate valuations and considered any conflicts of interest that the manager may have faced,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 1 month ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 1 month ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 1 month ago

While the controversial measures have received little support in the Senate, the think tank has said Division 296 would “make the nation’s super system fairer”....

4 hours ago

In its pre-election policy document, the FSC highlighted 15 priority reforms, with superannuation featuring prominently, urging both major parties to avoid changing super...

4 hours ago

With the merger between Mine Super and TWUSuper in its late stages, the head of the soon-to-be combined fund is the latest to join ASFA’s board. ...

5 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS