HUB24 has added the Insync Global Quality Equity fund to its platform and it is expected to be available in both investment and super accounts by the end of the year.
This was in addition to the Inysnc Global Titans separately managed account (SMA), which was managed with the same strategy on HUB24.
According to FE Analytics, the fund had returned 45.57% since inception on 2 July, 2018, to 30 November, 2020.
The firm said its investment philosophy revolved around “very high-quality companies that are benefiting from disruption, have long runways of growth through exposure to global megatrends, and are highly profitable”.
Monik Kotecha, Insync’s chief investment officer, said: “We wrap deep quantitative analysis around insights on industry disruption and the 16 key megatrends that our firm has identified as being predictive of long-term growth.”
The fund has received a superior rating from SQM, and Insync also recently won the Emerging Manager of the Year Award from Money Management.
Wes Gillett, Insync Funds Management national manager distribution, said: “The international element of a portfolio is now of even more interest for the advice industry when volatility and the income drought limit growth potential for portfolios. Our fund shows very low correlation in outperformance with all our international peers and should therefore deliver enhanced performance in blended portfolios over the long term.”
Return of the Insync Global Quality Equity fund since inception to 30 November 2020
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.