The Assistant Minister for Superannuation, Financial Services and Financial Technology, Senator Jane Hume has fired another shot over the bows of superannuation funds which have raised fees, suggesting the financial services regulators might care to scrutinise the funds.
Addressing a superannuation forum, Hume also questioned whether some funds were increasing fees because they had run down their administration reserves to historical lows.
“If a fund that has run down their administration reserves to historical lows over recent years then suddenly hikes fees to rebuild their buffers, I take a rather sceptical view of claims that the fee increases are the result of Government initiatives aimed at protecting small super accounts,” Hume said. “And I suspect the public will too. These claims will face scrutiny from the media, from their members, maybe from the regulators, and certainly from this government.”
The assistant minister said that many funds that received a substantial proportion of default super contribution had increased their administration fees in recent years irrespective of whether they were industry, retail or corporate funds.
“If some funds, especially the smaller ones, are increasing their fees because they are not of a size to spread the overheads required to invest in modern systems and deal with current compliance obligations, it truly speaks to everything I’ve said recently about the need to consider merging. Increasing fees and relying on employee inertia is a lazy solution and not in the best interests of members,” she said.
“But when it comes to some of the larger funds, we may need to dig a little deeper to find out the reasons behind fee increases.”
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.