Industry funds welcome annual meeting move

25 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The industry superannuation funds appear to have embraced a Government move to impose annual member meetings on superannuation funds.

The Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) chief executive, Evan Scheerlinck said providing a means for members to engage with the people managing their hard-earned superannuation represented a good way of identifying issues of most interest to members.

Scheerlinck said the Government’s package of superannuation reforms required careful analysis to ensure there were no unintended consequences for members.

Industry Super Australia (ISA) also welcomed the move towards annual member meetings, with ISA chief executive, David Whiteley welcoming what it said amounted to adoption of a recommendation from the governance review conducted by Bernie Fraser.

However, in doing so, Whiteley called for greater scrutiny of what he described as the “persistent underperformance” of bank-owned funds.

“The regulator must ascertain whether bank-owned super funds are prioritising shareholder interests over fund member interests, and the implications of this on retirement savings,” he said.

The Financial Services Council (FSC) also welcomed the Government’s legislative initiative claiming the annual meeting requirement for superannuation funds would result in better outcomes for consumers.

FSC chief executive, Sally Loane said: “Consumers should rightly have the power to ask questions of the directors and senior managers of their funds about how they are run, how their fees are spent and where their retirement savings are invested”.

 “The FSC strongly supports all proposals which give consumers more power and greater transparency over one of their most important assets – their superannuation savings,” she said.

“A more transparent superannuation system will enable the prudential regulator, APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority], to take action over underperformance of subscale funds. The FSC urges the government to ensure these reforms are accompanied by legislation to enable consumers to be able to choose the fund they want, and which would also allow competition into the default market.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 10 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 10 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 11 hours ago