Publicly-listed financial services technology provider, IRESS has injected itself into the calculations around the NSW Government's sale of Pillar Administration as a result of its move to acquire superannuation-focused software provider, Financial Synergy.
That is because Financial Synergy is Pillar's major provider with respect to the multi-million dollar platform consolidation exercise which is seen as fundamental to the Government's sale process of the administrator and its fortunes thereafter.
IRESS announced the transaction to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) yesterday, valuing the exercise at up to $90 million.
The announcement said that as a result of the transaction, IRESS had launched a fully underwritten institutional placement aimed at raising around $85 million.
IRESS chief executive, Andrew Walsh, said the acquisition of Financial Synergy would strongly complement the firm's existing capabilities and focus in Australia.
"IRESS currently provides a range of solutions to key segments of Australian financial services, underpinned by the growing superannuation industry," he said.
"Financial Synergy increases the range and scale of services and solutions IRESS can provide to clients of both businesses."
The ASX announcement said Financial Synergy was being sold by its majority owner and founder, David Orford, and the senior management team, with the senior management team being retained and continuing in their roles.
Significantly, Financial Synergy announced only last week that it had opened a new office in Wollongong to house its recently-launched managed services division.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.