The penalty regime for unpaid super has again been proven to be wanting, with the Senate Estimates Committee hearing yesterday that as many as 8 out of 10 employers have got away with failing to pay super on time.
Under questioning from deputy chair of the Senate Economic Committee, Senator Chris Ketter, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) confirmed that it routinely waived all penalties for late payment of super and had not levied a single 200 per cent maximum penalty in the last five years.
The ATO also admitted that it had inappropriately waived a nominal $20 per employee administrative fee penalty up until 2017.
Industry Super Australia (ISA) this morning called for an “urgent overhaul” of the penalty regime for unpaid super in light of this testimony, saying the current approach undercut the majority of employers who were doing the right thing.
“The wholesale waiver of statutory penalties prescribed under the law for failing to pay super on time is a green light to unscrupulous employers short-changing their workers’ super,” ISA deputy chief executive, Matt Linden, said.
“The ATO’s so called ‘practical compliance approach’ is causing a textbook moral hazard where employers take the risk knowing they won’t be caught or even if they are simply pay what they should have paid anyway (with nominal interest) and walk away.”
The organisation called for minimum mandatory penalties, slamming the $20 administrative penalty as “wholly inadequate and not even a parking ticket penalty”.
Linden predicted that should weak penalty enforcement continue, “the $6 billion a year problem will continue to spin out of control”.
Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Coalition, which has pledged to reverse any changes if it wins next year’s election.
In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges.
Chant West analysis suggests super could be well placed to deliver a double-digit result by the end of the calendar year.
Specific valuation decisions made by the $88 billion fund at the beginning of the pandemic were “not adequate for the deteriorating market conditions”, according to the prudential regulator.