ISA calls for Fair Work panel’s reconvening

29 May 2018
| By Hannah |
image
image
expand image

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has called on the Government to immediately reconstitute the Fair Work Commission’s expert panel to shortlist the best performing super funds, rejecting a suggestion from the Productivity Commission (PC) that another agency be created to do this work.

The PC’s review into superannuation found that such an agency could provide a short-list from which young workers could select a fund when they get their first job and then keep it for life.

“Industry super funds have long supported a merit-based selection process of default funds. This is currently the role of the Fair Work Commission and is in the best interests of members. Superannuation is deferred wages and a condition of employment,” ISA chief executive, David Whiteley said.

“To dismantle the Fair Work Commission process in favour of an unproven new government agency and require young workers to choose their super fund for life is high-risk for younger members.”

The organisation said that the super-fund-for-life proposal ignored behavioural economics.

“Younger workers are most likely to be disengaged from their long-away retirement and the proposal assumes an informed choice,” Whiteley said.

He said that the job of the Government was “to ensure that workers who do not choose their own super fund have their interests protected and are defaulted into an industry super fund”, pointing to the PC’s confirmation that industry super funds and not-for-profit funds outperformed their retail counterparts.

ISA also pointed out that the PC report focussed on default funds, even though their performance was not under scrutiny.

“The Productivity Commission’s report focuses on systematic underperformance of the retail and SMSF [self-managed super fund] sector, but its policy recommendations are detached from that analysis, focusing on the default sector, which has performed best,” ISA said.

“The Productivity Commission terms of reference unfortunately prevented it from thoroughly reviewing the retail choice sector and self-managed superannuation. This is regrettable because these sectors are where the most significant underperformance lies,” Whiteley said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

11 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

11 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

11 months 1 week ago

Jim Chalmers has defended changes to the Future Fund’s mandate, referring to himself as a “big supporter” of the sovereign wealth fund, amid fierce opposition from the Co...

1 day 7 hours ago

Demand from institutional investors was the main driver of growth in Australia’s responsible investment (RI) market in 2023, as the industry continued to gain momentum....

1 day 7 hours ago

In a new review of the country’s largest fund, a research house says it’s well placed to deliver attractive returns despite challenges....

1 day 8 hours ago